937,282 people
Source: Tyranny Tracker
HRF classifies Fiji as ruled by a hybrid authoritarian regime.
Since gaining independence from British rule in 1970, Fiji has experienced sustained political instability marked by four coups d’état, including one that was civilian-led, and multiple constitutional overhauls. Many of these coups were precipitated by a long-standing ethnic division between indigenous Fijians (or iTaukei) and Fijians of Indian descent, also known as Indo-Fijians. The latest coup in 2006 installed coup leader Frank Bainimarama as prime minister. His tenure lasted for 16 years after electoral victories in 2014 and 2018. In December 2022, a three-party, multiethnic opposition coalition led by Sitiveni Rabuka unseated Bainimarama through elections. Rabuka had previously staged coups in 1987.
Electoral competition is significantly skewed in favor of the regime, to the point where the real, mainstream political opposition has a highly unlikely although realistic chance to win. Until 2022, the government led by Bainimarama disqualified opposition figures through judicial proceedings, heavily controlled the media and campaign environment, and enacted electoral laws to sideline the opposition. While the new government under Rabuka has repealed some restrictive media regulations, independent electoral oversight remains flawed, with the incumbent continuing to appoint loyalists to key election management bodies.
Independent media, political leaders, civil society leaders, organizations, and members of the general public are seriously and unfairly hindered in their ability to openly criticize or challenge the regime. Although press and media freedom have improved under Rabuka’s government, public officials continue to employ sedition laws to silence critics, including journalists and political opponents. The regime also habitually denies permits for peaceful, dissenting protests.
Finally, institutions are somewhat independent but frequently constrained by the regime in a way that enables it to systematically weaken or dismantle accountability mechanisms. The 2013 constitution has provided legal protection to past coup perpetrators, limiting the ability of courts to ensure their accountability, although the establishment of a Trust and Reconciliation Commission in 2024 constitutes a step forward in promoting open dialogue and social cohesion in the island country. Independent oversight bodies continue to suffer from politically motivated appointments and executive interference, which reduces their effectiveness.
Hit enter to search or ESC to close