1,835,940 people
Source: Tyranny Tracker
HRF classifies Latvia as democratic.
Latvia is a parliamentary representative democratic republic in which executive authority is exercised by a government led by the prime minister, while the president serves as head of state with largely constitutional functions, including nominating the prime minister and possessing limited veto powers. Legislative power is shared between the government and the unicameral Saeima, a 100-member parliament elected every four years by proportional representation with a 5% electoral threshold, resulting in a fragmented multiparty system in which coalition governments are the norm. Following the 2022 parliamentary elections and subsequent political developments, a new government took office in September 2023, formed by a coalition of the New Unity party, the Union of Greens and Farmers, and The Progressives, under Prime Minister Evika Siliņa.
In Latvia, national elections are largely free and fair. Mainstream opposition parties and candidates are not unfairly excluded, and the competitive, pluralistic political environment, supported by independent oversight and rules on campaign conduct, financing, and media access, helps ensure that electoral competition proceeds without significant or undue hindrance.
Independent media, civil society, and members of the public are generally free to openly criticize or challenge the government. This is supported by a robust civil society operating under a favorable legal framework, a pluralistic and legally protected media environment without clear evidence of systematic government interference, strong protections for freedom of expression without routine censorship, and respect for the right to peaceful assembly, with protests typically proceeding without serious or unfair obstruction.
Institutions remain independent and generally function as effective checks on government authority. The country maintains a robust framework for judicial independence that has not been significantly weakened by government reforms, and judicial and regulatory bodies continue to operate autonomously, including reviewing and overturning executive actions. Executive and oversight institutions also function within a legal framework that largely preserves their independence, enabling effective and fair accountability of public officials, as demonstrated by ongoing anti-corruption investigations and high-profile convictions.
Hit enter to search or ESC to close