10,395,400 people
Source: Tyranny Tracker
HRF classifies Portugal as democratic.
Portugal is a semi-presidential republic. A 230-member, unicameral parliament (Assembleia da República) exercises legislative power. The president, directly elected by popular vote, appoints the prime minister and retains important constitutional prerogatives, including the authority to dissolve parliament, veto legislation, and declare a state of emergency. Portugal democratized following the 1974 Carnation Revolution, which ended the authoritarian Estado Novo regime that António de Oliveira Salazar had led for decades. A new constitution was adopted in 1976, ushering in a competitive multiparty system. Since then, the Socialist Party (PS) and the Social Democratic Party (PSD) have remained the dominant political forces, frequently alternating in power through peaceful elections.
National elections are largely free and fair. Robust campaign finance regulations, equitable media representation, and the absence of a specific threshold for entering Parliament contribute to highly competitive elections, in which a variety of political parties can gain power. Portugal’s electoral oversight bodies are impartial and perform their duties efficiently, despite experiencing some financial and staffing challenges in recent years.
Independent media, political leaders, civil society leaders, organizations, and members of the general public are generally free to openly criticize the government. Concerns over recent media ownership concentration notwithstanding, Portugal has a large number and variety of independent outlets, and authorities largely refrain from interfering with the work of civil society organizations or obstructing peaceful demonstrations.
Institutions are independent and largely serve as effective checks on the government. The courts have made progress in addressing corruption, despite shortcomings in Portugal’s implementation of its national anti-corruption strategy. However, the courts’ handling of defamation and slander cases has been frequently challenged as inconsistent with freedom of expression as outlined by the European Convention on Human Rights. Independent oversight mechanisms are also robust.
Hit enter to search or ESC to close