Source: Tyranny Tracker
HRF classifies Qatar as ruled by a fully authoritarian regime.
The Al Thani family has held centralized power in Qatar since the 19th century and absolute control over executive, legislative, and judicial institutions since gaining independence from Britain in 1971. Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, who was appointed heir apparent in 2003 and came to power as the emir of Qatar after his father, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, abdicated the throne in 2013, has expanded the Gulf emirate’s role in global politics and enacted sweeping economic and social liberalization reforms. Alongside these reforms, the regime exploits its control over the country’s vast oil and natural gas resources and the third-highest GDP per capita in the world to maintain stability and launder its international image while restricting all forms of political expression and systematically repressing dissent.
National elections are absent, and there is no democratic transition of power at any level of government in Qatar, rendering moot assessment of electoral competition. While the regime did hold a single election in 2021 for 30 out of 45 seats in the Shura Council, a consultative assembly with a minor advisory role, in accordance with the 2003 constitution after nearly 20 years of repeated delays, citizens voted to grant the emir authority to appoint the entire Shura Council and cancel all future elections in a 2024 referendum by a reported margin of 90.6%.
Independent media, political leaders, civil society leaders, organizations, and the general public face overt and systematic retaliation if they openly criticize or challenge the regime. The regime in Qatar instrumentalizes a web of interrelated laws with vague legal statutes that cast any dissent against it, including peaceful protest, as a criminal offense, and allow the regime to hold critics in arbitrary detention or solitary confinement for months without charge. These laws severely inhibit the ability of media and civil society organizations to operate independently of state interference and ultimately serve to discourage and punish formal and informal expressions of opposition to the regime.
Institutions largely fail to serve as independent checks on the regime. The emir rules by decree and appoints and dismisses all members of the governing Council of Ministers and the judiciary. As a result, the courts fail to hold regime officials accountable and frequently and unfairly rubber-stamp regime attempts to repress criticism or retaliate against those who express any opposition to its policies.
Hit enter to search or ESC to close
