fbpx Skip to main content

Op-Ed: Corporate America stands against injustices — except those ‘Made in China’

By Jun 13, 2020June 17th, 2021No Comments

This op-ed was published by The Hill on June 13, 2020. By Jenny Wang, HRF’s Strategic Advisor  The killing of George Floyd has ignited a civil society deeply disturbed by...

This op-ed was published by The Hill on June 13, 2020.

By Jenny Wang, HRF’s Strategic Advisor 

The killing of George Floyd has ignited a civil society deeply disturbed by systemic inequality and police brutality. In the wake of mass demonstrations throughout the country, countless companies have decided to speak out against injustice.

Sports brand Nike took to Instagram and Twitter, where they urged followers to “all be a part of the change. Don’t make any more excuses. Don’t sit back and be silent.” This is not Nike’s first time speaking out in support of racial equality. In 2018, Nike signed a multimillion-dollar contract with racial justice activist and former National Football League player Colin Kaepernick, the face of the brand’s “Dream Crazy” campaign, and while social media was flooded with calls to boycott Nike after signing this deal, the company went on to see a dramatic boost in sales.

But as thousands of peaceful protesters flooded the streets of Hong Kong to protest China’s creeping reach, Google and Apple both removed Hong Kong protest-related apps from their app stores; one a game using the Hong Kong protests as the theme and the other a live map allowing citizens to avoid violent riot police and tear gas.

The Chinese government, a one-party dictatorship, has brazenly weaponized the country’s vast economic power to intimidate foreign companies to comply with its political ideology, and even to help spread its party propaganda.

To protect their market share in China, a country with increasing wealth and consumer power, foreign companies have learned to self-censor any “sensitive topics” from their marketing language, including acknowledgment of the Tiananmen massacre and recognition of Taiwanand Tibet as independent countries.

When Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey tweeted a message of support for the demonstrations in Hong Kong, the National Basketball Association (NBA) immediately received backlash from Chinese fans online and the Chinese Basketball Association, calling for the NBA to fire Morey for supporting the pro-democracy protests that the Chinese government had been strongly condemning. After some initial stumbling, league commissioner Adam Silver affirmed the NBA’s support for freedom of speech and refused to censor Morey. Nike, being so worried about the Chinese government’s heated response to the NBA, pulled all Houston Rockets merchandise from their stores in China and stopped selling products designed by Jun Takahashi, a renowned Japanese streetwear designer, because he posted support for the Hong Kong protests on his social media.

By complying with the Chinese government’s political sensitivities at all costs, foreign companies that operate in China give aid to an authoritarian government that tightly controls what information its citizens can consume. Close ties or a proven willingness to work with the Chinese government could suggest that the company is more likely to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Companies’ censorship of information could also open them to prosecution under the Global Magnitsky Act, as the act sanctions anyone, including U.S. entities, for participating in or supporting corruption in connection with serious human rights abuses.

When the National Basketball Association (NBA) refused China’s calls for self-censorship, fans in the U.S. and abroad applauded the league’s values-driven leadership. Although the NBA lost revenue on game broadcasts from China’s official state television by refusing to fire Morey, private platforms have resumed streaming games for fans in China, and the league remains as popular as before, if not more so.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) indices suggest that companies that take into account ESG factors, such as human rights practices, in their operations perform better financially. But even so, corporations are naturally wary of taking public positions on contentious issues, and are reticent to do so unless compelled into action by employees, consumers and shareholders. That is why public pressure is vital to push global brands towards speaking up against inequality and injustice abroad as well as at home.

Against the backdrop of a global decline in human rights and freedom, the voices of corporate America – and the resulting impact – can be even louder and more powerful. If consumers demand that the brands they buy lead with democratic values and uphold fundamental human rights for everyone, regardless of race or nationality, they have a chance to truly make a difference.

As Nike said, “Don’t make any more excuses.” Just do it.